May 2011

“The Waiting Game”

by Alex Knapp on May 31, 2011

Wow. Just…. wow.

I’m eternally fascinated by the current Christian pop culture focus on abstinence – which is what this incredibly bad looking movie is about. In large part because it makes light of human relationships, and reduces religious devotion to a simple bit of self-control. It also, of course, ignores the role that sex is going to play in people’s lives when they get married at 30 instead of 18.

Of course, this is in large part because there’s a substantial portion of American Christianity that’s largely Pharasaic in nature – following the letter of the law but ignoring its spirit. They care more about looking good than doing good. But that’s a long rant for another time.

Suffice to say, this movie doesn’t make abstinence look attractive.

However, I’d say this is probably a good candidate movie for getting smashed with a bunch of friends when you want to make fun of a bad movie.

(link via Jen McCreight)

{ 7 comments }

Another year, another birthday.

I am definitely in the Kirk in Star Trek II mood every birthday.  But then, I always think about that movie on my birthday, and I realize that one thing that rarely goes remarked about when it comes to that film is Kirk’s incredible, incredible character arc in the movie.  One of the best in mainstream film, really.

{ 4 comments }

When the Rapture Doesn’t Come

by Alex Knapp on May 20, 2011

Fred Clark has some rather poignant thoughts about those who honestly believe that the Rapture is coming on Saturday.

Talk to anyone who grew up in a Rapture-believing church or family and they will tell you stories about panic-inducing moments when they found themselves suddenly alone and feared that everyone else had been raptured while they had been rejected by God. This guy thinks that’s funny, but it’s actually traumatic. That’s why no one forgets the horror of such moments. Laughing at one’s own trauma can be transformational and healthy. Laughing at someone else’s trauma is just cruel.

That fear and trauma, we were sometimes told, was a good thing. It was a holy terror — a reminder to make certain that we prayed the right prayers and felt the right feelings to ensure that we would not be among those left behind. This is what they thought the scriptures meant when they spoke of “the fear of the Lord” — the powerless terror of the child of an abusive parent.

And that terror is what Harold Camping and his followers are feeling now. And it is what they will be feeling again Saturday evening, after that terror and despair first abates, then metastasizes in the realization that the world has not ended and that they are not the righteous remnant they staked their identities on being.

Read the whole thing.  This all goes back to the dangers of letting yourself become trapped by powerful story.  Like Fred, I do wish there was something I could do to reach out to these folks.

{ 3 comments }

Okay, this is the last “jumpstart” idea before I start seriously tackling tom p’s question.  But I have always been in love with this scene from Star Trek: The Next Generation‘s final episode:

It’s a shame, really, that the movies never lived up to the promise of this scene, or that final episode.

{ 1 comment }

Lessons Learned From Parodying Ayn Rand

by Alex Knapp on May 17, 2011

Ellis Weiner, who wrote the Atlas Shrugged parody Atlas Slugged Again has a little post up about what inspired him to write the parody.

But Atlas Shrugged is a 1,000-page, 643,000-(I counted them)-word diatribe against an imaginary enemy that, unlike Lord of the Rings or the Harry Potter books, insists it’s about “reality.”

The government of the U.S., such as it is, has no executive, legislative, or judicial branches. There is no president, Congress, or Supreme Court. Instead, a corrupt cabal of bureaucrats issues edicts based, ostensibly, on the rationale of a whiny five-year-old (“It’s not fair!”) while essentially safeguarding their own power, but which go unchallenged by individuals, states, or corporations. Europe is unrecognizable, since most of its countries have become quasi-socialist “People’s States.” This is a world in which salvation arrives in the form of a reclusive engineer who is begged to “save the economy.”

In other words, the geo-political world in which Rand wants us to admire her heroes is not our own, or even (like that of 1984) a plausible, allegorical variant of our own, but a third-rate science fiction dystopian future, complete with imaginary technology, which, by definition, makes comparison to today’s world impossible. The U.S. of Atlas Shrugged is about as real and realistic as Narnia, and capitalism is to Atlas Shrugged what Quidditch is to Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone: a fictional construct, vaguely similar to something we have in real life, used for purposes of drama and entertainment.

That about sums it up.  I’ve also read Weiner’s parody, which is very funny.  And the more you know about Objectivism, the funnier it is.  There are more than a few inside jokes.

I think it’s a shame, by the way, that the author of Anthem and We the Living, both of which are very good books, had to turn into such a polemicist. The Fountainhead is still a decent potboiler.  But I can barely read Atlas Shrugged anymore.  Mostly because it reminds me of far too many years I spent being a Rand acolyte.  I was never, thank God, a full blown Orthodox Objectivist, but I was definitely pretty obsessed.

It’s worth mentioning, though, that Rand was, in some ways a pretty compelling thinker and had some ideas I still carry with me.  And there were two important things she taught me: first, that moral actions and practical actions should, if you look in the long term, be one and the same and second, that ethical dilemmas should be focused on day to day living, not fantastical situations that you’ll never encounter in real life, like the Trolley problem.

I might add, too, that the character of Peter Keating in The Fountainhead is one of the best projections of the dangers of selling out I’ve ever read.  His character arc is both tragic and all too common in real life.

{ 21 comments }

The Nicene Creed As Scorekeeping

by Alex Knapp on May 11, 2011

The First Council of Nicea is actually on my list of places I’d like to visit if time travel were possible, so I’m well aware that the Nicene Creed is, in many ways, a litany against the varieties/heresies of Christian thought. (And as a guy who thinks that Adoptionism and Pelagianism are much more in keeping with the meaning of Gospels, I wouldn’t have gotten very far. [And yes, I know that Pelagianism didn't exist at the time of the First Council. That's not the point. /pedantry])

That said, I’m not surprised that most people don’t know or understand the Nicene Creed. So I thought that Leah Libresco’s metaphor for the Creed was pretty apt.

Reading through the list, I’m reminded of the tradition of fighter pilots keeping a painted tally of enemy aircraft down on the side of their own plane. This is a list of rebukes to defeated heresies that few people besides theologians are acquainted with. I couldn’t ever really make sense of the Creed until I read Diarmaid MacCulloch’s Christianity: The First 3000 Years and ran across them in his history.

Leah goes on to lament this, though, thinking that a focus on this type of abstraction leads away from some fundamental Christian questions. Personally, though, I disagree. Maybe that’s because early Christian heresies are something of a hobbyhorse of mine. But really it’s more because I wish that modern day Christianity was more in touch with the early Church, rather than blindly accepting the stale litany of a bunch of guys forced to make an accomodation at swordpoint to the needs of the state.

But that’s probably just me.

{ 3 comments }

I found this little talk by Professor Hunter Rawlings, President Emeritus of Cornell University, to be really fascinating.

{ 1 comment }

I Never Thought I’d Say This….

by Alex Knapp on May 11, 2011

…. But Michael Bolton is pretty awesome in this:

{ 2 comments }

Preach It, Saint Douglas!

by Alex Knapp on May 8, 2011

I am a big fan of Douglas Rushkoff — if you haven’t read his book Life, Inc., you definitely should. So since it’s Sunday, we need a little preaching, don’t we? So here’s Rushkoff at his canonization at the Church of Life After Shopping. It’s wonderful:

{ 1 comment }

“But if there were no pain, if there were no fear, then what does it matter that we live together, that our lives touch? If our actions have no consequences, if nothing can be bad, then we might as well die, all of us, because we are just well oiled and running smoothly with no need to think, nothing to value, because there are no problems to solve and nothing we can lose.”
– Jason Worthing, in Orson Scott Card’s The Worthing Saga

This has stuck with me ever since I first read it when I was 14 years old.

{ 1 comment }