Paging Rod Dreher and E.D. Kain – Prince Charles sounds like your kind of royalty.
by Will on July 9, 2009
Paging Rod Dreher and E.D. Kain – Prince Charles sounds like your kind of royalty.
Tagged as: Crunchy Cons, Prince Charles
Will writes from Washington, D.C. (well, Arlington, Virginia). You can reach him at willblogcorrespondence at gmail dot com.
Borat, Art, and the Eye of the Beholder
Borat: “I do a picture, only small, of the Tishnik Masacre. Where many Uzbeks…crushed!”
Kindly Gray Hippie: “How did you feel when you drew this?”
Borat: “Very proud!”.
KGH: “I am just listening with sadness…sadness for your people…?”
Borat: “Yes…no, it is not sad. It is us who do the kill!”
When in doubt, consult the classics [5:30 mark].
( 0 comments)
Over on the Mindless Diversions site...
Our intrepid commenter A Teacher tells the story of how he published his NaNoWriMo book (and, of course, tells us how we can get a copy of it for ourselves). ( 0 comments)
Nobel Peace Prize Jury Faces Formal Inquiry
Read the story here. Here’s the paragraph that would make clicking through worthwhile, if you’re still undecided:
If the Stockholm County Administrative Board, which supervises foundations in Sweden’s capital, finds that prize founder Alfred Nobel’s will is not being honored, it has the authority to suspend award decisions going back three years — though that would be unlikely and unprecedented, said Mikael Wiman, a legal expert working for the county. ( 7 comments)
{ 1 comment }
A few thoughts:
1) Easy for a Prince to say we “can’t afford consumerism.” I mean, that’s like Brad Pitt critiquing people for buying shit. Gimme a break.
2) 96 months…?
3) In my own self-exploration I have determined that I am not so much anti-capitalist (or anti-market) as I am anti-corporatist (and by that I mean, the sort of massive, state-subsidized corporations that have taken so much power out of the hands of start-ups and innovators, etc. and that drive the impersonal form of capitalism we see so much of now). Not capitalism itself.
I tend to think that capitalism is simply the easy scapegoat and that I fell too much toward that trap. It’s the monopoly of state and corporate players on the markets that creates so much of the inequities we now face. (which is not to say that government couldn’t function well, only that it doesn’t and that it’s prone not to….)
Re: modernity. Ah. Well, what I’ve come to believe is that a certain sustained critique of greed, materialism, etc. is important to counterweight the very domineering forces (shallow but sharp) of consumerism and selfishness etc. But that is not to say that anything beyond encouraging selflessness, the arts, self-reliance, the importance of family and community, etc. can be done or should be done, or that modernity is in and of itself bad at all. Only that the emphasis on individuality and entitlement has outgrown more sober qualities. When the new tosses out the old entirely we run into unintended consequences. The reverse, of course, is also true….
Comments on this entry are closed.