Pretty interesting analysis of Calvin’s theology and the evolution of capitalism, manifest destiny, and American exceptionalism. (h/t Conor)
by E.D. Kain on July 10, 2009
E.D. Kain is a blogger and freelance writer. Currently he serves as Editor-in-Chief of The League of Ordinary Gentlemen and writes a tech blog at Forbes. Visit his politics blog here. He can be found occasionally composing 140 character cultural analysis on Twitter. His writing has appeared in The Atlantic, The National Review, The Washington Examiner, and the now-defunct True/Slant. You can also contact him via email.
Nobel Peace Prize Jury Faces Formal Inquiry
Read the story here. Here’s the paragraph that would make clicking through worthwhile, if you’re still undecided:
If the Stockholm County Administrative Board, which supervises foundations in Sweden’s capital, finds that prize founder Alfred Nobel’s will is not being honored, it has the authority to suspend award decisions going back three years — though that would be unlikely and unprecedented, said Mikael Wiman, a legal expert working for the county. ( 5 comments)
A Little Side Project of Mine
As if I needed another blog! This one’s dedicated to translating some of the never-before-translated work of the French neo-Romantic poet Edmond Rostand, author of Cyrano de Bergerac and member of the Académie française.
Everyone knows Cyrano, of course, but much of Rostand’s lyric work has never been read in English before. I’m trying to change that, one poem at a time. ( 7 comments)
Regulatory Capture
Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal ( 2 comments)
{ 1 comment }
While I’m not exactly a scholar of American religious history, I think there’s a lot of slight of hand in Linker’s piece — he skips far too easily from Calvin (expressing a particular view about the relationship between God and history) to a series of paragraphs filled with fairly generic quotes by American Christians (ranging from the Puritan-specific “picked out for the work” of founding New England “by the provident hand of the most high” to the contemporary “visible direction, set by liberty and the Author of liberty.”)
Someone more knowledgeable than I can correct me if I am wrong, but I would say that [a] these sentiments are quite typical of American Christians in general [b] that the relationship between Calvin and these sentiments is tenuous, owing much more to the historical exigencies of the Puritan situation than to anything specific in Calvin’s writings (note that Linker’s discussion of Calvin himself adds up to little more than a “Calvin thought God was working his purposes through historical events”, which is not, as far as I know, considered to be one of the more controversial points of Calvinism in relationship to other major strands of Christian theology) and [c] that Calvinism, though influential in America through the Puritans, has never been anything more than a minority strain of Christianity.
Comments on this entry are closed.