teh crazy

by E.D. Kain on September 3, 2009

Well, no political fringe has a monopoly on crazy, that’s for sure.

{ 9 comments }

1 greginak September 3, 2009 at 12:38 pm

But luckily the protester against health care reform had Medicaid.

2 E.D. Kain September 3, 2009 at 1:17 pm

I hope the biter gets stuck with the final bill, personally.

3 Michael Drew September 4, 2009 at 1:18 am

He won’t, rightly. It was self-defense (albeit against an attack he provoked). Thankfully, he was not armed.

4 Jaybird September 4, 2009 at 8:19 am

Wasn’t armed? He had enough weaponry to dismember the person who attacked him.

5 Michael Drew September 4, 2009 at 5:00 pm

Ridiculous. Renders the term meaningless.

6 Michael Drew September 3, 2009 at 9:37 pm

The report I heard was that the anti-guy threw a punch, though that was after the pro-guy initiated a verbal confrontation. We should wait to see what emerges. And we should note in passing that choosing to bear arms in what could have remained a peaceful political context is itself a non-peaceful escalation that puts people on both sides on edge. There is no such thing as peacefully bringing a gun to political event. That choice is itself a violent one, as are the choices to throw a punch or to bite someone’s finger off.

“Don’t pull the thang out, unless you plan to bang… Don’t even bang unless you plan to hit something.”
/
“…Should have held back but you throwed the punch.”

7 Michael Drew September 3, 2009 at 10:23 pm

– Two punches thrown by eventual bite victim, per bite victim’s account:

http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/09/finger-biting-victim-speaks—-to-a-reverent-neil-cavuto.php?ref=fpb

8 Mark Thompson September 3, 2009 at 11:02 pm

As usual I find myself unable to muster up any sympathy for either party. They’re both pretty clearly nutcases, and I don’t see much value in debating who the bigger nutcase is.

9 Michael Drew September 4, 2009 at 1:16 am

No doubt. Apparently the pro-guy just went up to the anti-guy and started calling him an idiot. That will occasionally get you punched. But then punching will occasionally get you bit.

Not that you were responding to me, but I’m blaming the jitteriness on both sides, and quickness to actual violence, partly on the introduction of the threat of violence to the discussion by the act of bearing arms. Perhaps that’s stilted or contentious, but there it is.

Comments on this entry are closed.