Ross Douthat has a smart post on why we shouldn’t opportunistically try terror suspects in civilian courts.
by Will on November 24, 2009
Ross Douthat has a smart post on why we shouldn’t opportunistically try terror suspects in civilian courts.
Tagged as: terrorism, the courts
Will writes from Washington, D.C. (well, Arlington, Virginia). You can reach him at willblogcorrespondence at gmail dot com.
Borat, Art, and the Eye of the Beholder
Borat: “I do a picture, only small, of the Tishnik Masacre. Where many Uzbeks…crushed!”
Kindly Gray Hippie: “How did you feel when you drew this?”
Borat: “Very proud!”.
KGH: “I am just listening with sadness…sadness for your people…?”
Borat: “Yes…no, it is not sad. It is us who do the kill!”
When in doubt, consult the classics [5:30 mark].
( 0 comments)
Over on the Mindless Diversions site...
Our intrepid commenter A Teacher tells the story of how he published his NaNoWriMo book (and, of course, tells us how we can get a copy of it for ourselves). ( 0 comments)
Nobel Peace Prize Jury Faces Formal Inquiry
Read the story here. Here’s the paragraph that would make clicking through worthwhile, if you’re still undecided:
If the Stockholm County Administrative Board, which supervises foundations in Sweden’s capital, finds that prize founder Alfred Nobel’s will is not being honored, it has the authority to suspend award decisions going back three years — though that would be unlikely and unprecedented, said Mikael Wiman, a legal expert working for the county. ( 7 comments)
{ 2 comments }
How funny that now even conservatives criticize something by calling it Bush-like. Though unless it’s a kangaroo court that experienced prosecutors refuse to have anything to do with, it’s not Bush-like at all.
Why not try the suspects in civilian court, after all didn’t AG Holder all but promise a conviction? Even Obama in his interview seemed sure that KSM would be convicted.
Comments on this entry are closed.