Apparently I’m not the only one with doubts. Though, I must say, Krugman is a fair bit more defeatist than my own counter-factual postulated.
Previous post: Panda-gone
Next post: Bold Moves in Detroit?
Apparently I’m not the only one with doubts. Though, I must say, Krugman is a fair bit more defeatist than my own counter-factual postulated.
Tagged as: barack obama, buyer's remorse, Paul Krugman
Scott is a sometimes blogger and social media consultant/principal at East Side Media. In addition to writing at the League of Ordinary Gentlemen, Scott is also a founding member of Beams and Struts and a fellow at the Canadian Council for Democracy's blog the Commons. You can reach Scott via email and follow him on Twiter.
Previous post: Panda-gone
Next post: Bold Moves in Detroit?
Libertarianism in a Nutshell
I fancy meself a South Park Republican, no prig he, more likely to laugh at the ineptness of somebody trying to offend him than to be offended. A Piss Christ or a Virgin Mary made of elephant shit is so last century it’s hardly worth the bother of feigning outrage.
But I do confess that our friends and allies in Japan have come up with something I’m compelled/appalled enough to hide behind a link.
The only consolation is that there’s really nothing to be done for an encore. ( 9 comments)
Mildly distracting notes on distraction
“Throw away your books; no longer distract yourself; it is not allowed…” -Marcus Aurelius, Meditations II: 2 read more... ( 3 comments)
*Sigh*....
Yes, yes, I know…
Go ahead and gloat.
http://gawker.com/5912071/lbj-school-of-pubic-affairs-apologizes-after-unfortunate-typo-goes-public ( 3 comments)
Get smart with the Thesis WordPress Theme from DIYthemes.
{ 4 comments }
Well to be fair, Krugman never liked Obama much. I actually had to stop reading him during the campaign because he ended up such a shill for Hillary.
And that headline…everyone seems to misunderstand that line. Obama was explicitly disavowing being “the one we were waiting for” and instead insisting that it was us, ourselves, as active citizens in our communities.
That’s fair, yes. And as mentioned, I’m not as gloomy as Krugman. In terms of the messaging, that might have been Obama’s message, but I think Krugman correctly uses the message as it was popularly received/understood.
Yeah Krugman was pretty much Hillary’s Sullivan.
Consider that Jimmy Carter was graced with Democratic majorities in Congress larger than Obama has (though the Democratic caucus was at that time much more variegated ideologically than is the case today) and was stymied in most of his efforts. Mr. Carter, it should be recalled, had experience as a public executive and two serious careers (in engineering and agribusiness) before entering politics. Obama’s a bantamweight in comparison.
I think if Dr. Krugman or anyone else expected much of anything they were bound to be disappointed. The institutional set up has a strong bias toward stagnation and corruption, quite apart from the intentions of the Administration of the day. As for intentions, I doubt there has been an Administration more inclined to crony capitalism in living memory.
Comments on this entry are closed.