Read the whole thing here.
Good Eugene Robinson column on “Jihad Jane” and security profiling
Will writes from Washington, D.C. (well, Arlington, Virginia). You can reach him at willblogcorrespondence at gmail dot com.
Gifts of Gab Around the League
Pierre Corneille Mere Dicta I confess that although I think such personal state...
London conference venues Romance Tips From Ayn Rand Thanks for the insightful article. I found it reall...
Will Truman Monday Trivia #46 Tuesday hint: ...
Patrick Cahalan Peter Van Dyck: "Conservative" Artist? I read this on the front page, and then wrote a com...
Cornelius Ron Paul and the People Ron Paul is certainly far from ideal but voting for...
wardsmith Monday Trivia #46 You know Ryan, except for those two I was amazingly...
Tod Kelly Peter Van Dyck: "Conservative" Artist? Excellent contribution to the discussion. Also, ye...
Tom Van Dyke Peter Van Dyck: "Conservative" Artist? Thx, Mr. Murali. I struggled most to put into word...
-
-
~ Off the Cuff
Valentine's Day in Westeros
A Game of Thrones themed Valentine’s Day cards. ( 0 comments)Borat, Art, and the Eye of the Beholder
Borat: “I do a picture, only small, of the Tishnik Masacre. Where many Uzbeks…crushed!”
Kindly Gray Hippie: “How did you feel when you drew this?”
Borat: “Very proud!”.
KGH: “I’m just listening with sadness…a little sadness for your people…?”
Borat: “Yes…no, it is not sad. It is us who do the kill!”
When in doubt, consult the classics [5:30 mark].
( 2 comments)Over on the Mindless Diversions site...
Our intrepid commenter A Teacher tells the story of how he published his NaNoWriMo book (and, of course, tells us how we can get a copy of it for ourselves). ( 2 comments)
{ 14 comments }
And yet all the terrorism screening failed to catch the Underwear bomber, while regular police work caught Jihad Jane. Screening can only address what has already been tried, it fails to deal with creativity. That is not to say we should have no screening, nor should we have discriminatory screening based on external features (that causes the same problem, once the bad guys know what is being screened for), but we should realize that screening has a point of diminishing returns, and we’ve long gotten past that point.
We in the US don’t have “screening,” we have security theater which masquerades as “screening.” If you want real screening go fly El Al.
wow i always thought those metal detector and x ray machines did something. who knew?
All they do is cause bad guys to plan around them, they don’t even slow them down much.
ummm well forcing the bad guys to come up with more elaborate or difficult schemes is actually part of the purpose. I’m no fan of the security theater, but jets aren’t exactly falling out of sky due to terrorist attacks now are they?
If the X-mass bomber’s bomb had worked we would have seen hundreds dead when a little racial profiling would have stopped him. What is the point of searching old white grandmothers when we know who the terrorists are? When will the squeamish liberals wake up?
oh so you didn’t actually pay any attention to what happened with the undie bomber. profiling was irrelevant, we had good intell, that went far beyond any need to profile. and isn’t the point of the jihad jane piece that you cant tell who is a bad guy by f’ing looking at them.
But we didn’t use it. What saved us from the junk bomber was stupid luck. Had he not jiggled some connections loose, we’d have had a gaping hole in the side of that airplane.
Now, this is *NOT* me saying “we need to institute profiling!”
I don’t think we do.
I do think that what we are doing is not working and, since it’s not working, we’d probably be better off with pre-9/11 security.
Umm so what isnt’ working and how do you know that? There are many, many different security measures, which ones are useful and which aren’t.
taking shoes off is almost certainly stupid.
Well, let’s see… of the top of my head, I’ve got No Fly Lists and confiscation of bottled water (and/or all liquids of amounts greater than 3.4 ounces).
The liquids thing really bugs me because they take these potential binary explosives and throw them into a 55-gallon drum with all of the other potential binary explosives… they treat potential binary explosives as if they were about as harmless as a bottle of water or tube of toothpaste.
Even the binary explosives thing is stupid. Getting binary explosives to work is tricky at best, and in the limited facilities of an aircraft, even more so.
Powerful explosives in the hands of amateurs (the kind that can make gaping holes with small amounts) usually either fizzle out (because they made them too stable, see the underwear bomber) or explode far too early, killing the bomber/bomb maker before they reach their target. And professional bomb-makers (generally) aren’t interested in performing local detonation, so they have to hand the bomb off to an amateur at some point.
Of course, these days, a small bang seems to terrify people and government almost as well as a big bang does. I can’t wait until some knucklehead lights a bag of firecrackers on board and DHS looses their minds.
They weren’t exactly falling out of the sky before 9/11 either.
The last time we flew to Canada, Maribou and I were selected for “additional screening”.
To my eternal shame, I found myself thinking “oh, good… we get to skip the line.”
related:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/jeremy_clarkson/article7052392.ece
Comments on this entry are closed.