In defense of Mel Gibson

by E.D. Kain on July 21, 2010

Perhaps this stems from my admiration of Mel Gibson the filmmaker or perhaps it is simply because I hate to see a piling-on when someone is so obviously in such a dire straits, but I feel compelled to come to Gibson’s defense. Obviously, the things Gibson said to his girlfriend were horrible, and if he did hit her then that is even more indefensible. But I think it is also quite obvious at this point that Gibson has a serious addiction problem and quite likely serious mental problems as well. If he has been diagnosed with bipolar disorder, this may account for quite a few of his demons, including his inability to stay on the wagon or to his faith. It may also account, to some degree, for his creative brilliance.

I suppose Gibson is at his best when navigating the straight and narrow of his Catholic teaching (and that he belongs to a traditionalist catholic church is, as far as I can tell, immaterial here). When he falls off that wagon he falls off all the rest. He has admitted that his divorce was his fault, plain and simple. He is now likely at the very bottom of whatever pit he has dug for himself. Guilt over his failed marriage, his drinking problem – it is all converging. And standing at the center of this convergence is the woman he wrecked his marriage upon, like some hideous reminder of all his failings.

Furthermore, these sorts of people – at once rich and creative and hugely vulnerable to bad influences – are like flames to the worst sort of moths. At their worst they are manipulated and taken advantage of and used up. I suspect Oksana Grigorieva is one of these moths – perhaps if Gibson had taped her without her knowledge a broader picture of their relationship would have emerged. I suspect there is much more to the story.

This certainly doesn’t make the things Gibson said any less awful. Then again anger, mental illness, alcoholism, despair – these are powerful and poisonous and anyone has been through any of this – through addiction, despair, divorce, etc. knows that we all say things we don’t mean. (Even those who haven’t had addiction problems or marriage problems have likely been to these dark places inside themselves.) We lash out. We suddenly use the language of our fathers – of a past we thought we’d buried deep. Certainly Gibson was not raised in a home that looked favorably upon minorities. One doesn’t need to be a racist to have that impulse rise up like bile in moments of despair.

I’ve certainly said things I’ve regretted in darker times in my own life. I’m certainly not without my own grave errors, my own hateful words. I can’t imagine being taped during such a painful time as this, in the middle of a hideous fight at the end of a crumbling relationship.

In the end, we have only a few details, only a scrap or shred of the truth, and yet we all rush as quickly as we can to judgment. That’s a wagon we can all easily stay upon and never fall off.

To the stone throwers, perhaps it’s best we remembered sound advice given long ago: he who is without sin, throw the first stone. If you know for sure what is roiling about in Gibson’s heart and mind, throw away. Those of us who have sailed through this life free from any hateful thoughts, any prejudices, any moments of rage, keep lobbing. I, for one, hope that all is not as bad as it seems. I will reserve my own faulty judgment in any case.

I hope Gibson submits himself to a higher judgment. And I hope he can come out of this darkness and be forgiven.

Then I hope he makes another amazing film.

{ 33 comments }

1 Will H. July 21, 2010 at 3:29 pm

I’ve been thinking a lot the same thing.
I think it’s inappropriate that the recordings are being played by the media, and especially so if this is intended for use as evidence.
The whole thing has been cast to be inflammatory and prejudicial.
On the human side of it, I’m sure there are some serious issues there, and the airplay can only make matters worse.
I strongly suspect that’s why the tapes were released.

2 Geoff Arnold July 21, 2010 at 3:39 pm

Or perhaps Hitch is right, and Gibson really is a violent, misogynistic, racist bigot, and the recordings were simply released out of exasperation that people like you keep on making excuses for him.

Or something like that.

(And no, he probably isn’t bipolar – see http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2010/07/dissent-of-the-day-ctd-1.html for more details.)

3 Rufus July 21, 2010 at 4:31 pm

@Geoff Arnold, Since I married a bipolar (sounds like a 50s sci-fi movie) I’d like to alter what you said- Gibson might well be bipolar, but his condition isn’t likely a motivating factor here. When untreated, bipolars tend to oscillate between crushing depression and delusional euphoria, and neither of those tend to include wild rage towards others. They might well be that way on their own, but the important point is that their disorder isn’t what makes them behave that way.

4 E.D. Kain July 21, 2010 at 10:36 pm

@Rufus, I don’t think bipolar disorder alone could account for the violence, but addiction to alcohol certainly could. So could past abuse. I’m fairly certain if we peeled back the history of Gibson’s childhood we’d find some.

5 Francis July 21, 2010 at 4:06 pm

Please note that his conduct (and his alleged mental condition) can be found every day of the week in the criminal courts in every good-sized county. But expressions of sympathy for this lot are very rare.

6 Bob July 21, 2010 at 4:25 pm

@Francis, thank you for your note of sanity.

7 silentbeep July 21, 2010 at 4:41 pm

@Bob,

thank you francis for bringing some sanity into this where E.D. could not.

8 Jonathan July 21, 2010 at 9:27 pm

@silentbeep, Thank you, silentbeep for being gracious as someone tried to work through the complexities of the human soul.

Oh wait…

9 silentbeep July 22, 2010 at 12:11 am

@Jonathan,

this is not about complexities. this is about condoning abuse. you are welcome!

10 E.D. Kain July 21, 2010 at 10:36 pm

@Francis, Nor are they discussed as much in the negative as Gibson has been. They’re not famous.

11 Michael Drew July 21, 2010 at 4:40 pm

“Another amazing film.” The other one obviously being Lethal Weapon 3, right?

12 Jaybird July 21, 2010 at 4:58 pm

@Michael Drew, Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome.

13 E.D. Kain July 21, 2010 at 10:38 pm

@Michael Drew, Braveheart, Apocalypto, Gallipoli, The Year of Living Dangerously, Hamlet…

14 silentbeep July 21, 2010 at 4:41 pm

E.D. Please give me a break. None of us are without fault, but not many of us admit to criminal activity. It’s really interesting that you have chosen to soft-pedal this kind of violent, mysoginistic language. He never denies hitting her in these tapes, with child in arms. I don’t think you get how terrifying it is to be a woman in that position.

I wasn’t aware that you were a psychiatrist able to diagnose manic depressives without meeting them. If someone were advocating for violence to be done to him, I’d agree with you. If someone were advocating that he “burn in hell” I agree with you. I also believe in forgivenenss and redemption, but I also know it’s important to take responsbility for one’s actions, and to recognize when someone has done something this abusive and terrifying. What I mostly see are people merely recognizing Mel Gibson’s language for what it is, which is violent, rage-filled, racist, woman-hating threats. Calling it as it is, is all that is going on, and yet, you fill the need to defend him from what? People recognizing that what came out of his mouth is unacceptable? Oh please.

Hopefully he can pull himself together, I wouldn’t wish any further harm on him, I think he is suffering. That does not make what he did any better.

Beating girlfriends, threatening them with violence over the phone is not a private matter that should be kept hidden. Abuse thrives in secrecy, no matter what the initial cause are for abuse . it is a criminal matter. Good for her that she exposed him if only in the mere interest, to keep her and her child safe.

15 ThatPirateGuy July 22, 2010 at 6:41 am

@silentbeep,

I’d like to see him in jail, not making movies.

16 Jaybird July 21, 2010 at 4:57 pm

Eh. The guy has made some friggin’ awesome movies.

He’s also a shit.

Look throughout history to find similar examples. Pollock was a wife beater. Vincent Van Gogh was nuts. Ike Turner, needs no description after the comma. Hell, Bebe friggin’ WINANS got arrested for spousal abuse.

You can be a hell of an artist and still be a shit of a man. Ain’t no surprise there.

17 Geoff Arnold July 21, 2010 at 5:27 pm

@Jaybird, And he’s also made some really, really offensive movies. His visceral hate of everything English is obvious; I don’t know if Hitch’s connection with Henry VIII’s break from Rome is correct, but I wouldn’t be surprised.

18 Jaybird July 21, 2010 at 5:30 pm

@Geoff Arnold, wait, he wrote offensive stuff?

Well, then.

THROW THE BOOK AT HIM!!!

19 Geoff Arnold July 21, 2010 at 5:47 pm

@Jaybird, No, I was just responding to the love-fest about his film-making. (And just because “Passion” accurately quote anti-Semitic language by some 1900-year old dude doesn’t excuse its anti-Semitism.)

20 Jaybird July 21, 2010 at 6:15 pm

@Geoff Arnold, there’s no accounting for matters of taste.

I understand why some folks would want to pull a “but he must not be *THAT* bad, deep down, if he was capable of creating something so wonderful”.

It’s like folks feel like they can’t enjoy the art if they know that the artist was a shit… and they know that they enjoy the art (seriously: Listen to Rocket 88 again)… therefore the artist must not have been that bad, deep down.

Hey. I’m just saying that the artist can be someone who can create stuff like Number 1, 1950 (Lavender Mist) while being someone who can beat up his wife.

And this isn’t some “tortured artist” bullshit about how maybe one was because of the other thing either.

Someone can be someone capable of brilliant (even brilliantly offensive) art while, at the exact same time, being a shit of a person.

You’d think we’d get used to feet of clay by now.

21 Jaybird July 21, 2010 at 5:36 pm

@Geoff Arnold, wait, let me try again.

I remember seeing The Patriot and being irritated as hell. (Interestingly, I saw it in Canada with my wife and her brother… afterwards he said “wow, it must have been awesome to watch that as an American!” I told him what I’m about to tell you.)

It didn’t discuss stuff like Rights or the Enlightenment or Human Dignity or anything like that. It was about a guy who didn’t want to fight the British until the British killed his firstborn.

So, I suppose, it’s interesting that The Patriot had a Conservative rather than a Progressive hero… but, anyway, when I think of the Fathers of the Revolution, I think of the more Jeffersonian arguments. The Patriot was crap.

But, you know what? That doesn’t really matter, does it? It’s on me for being an idiot for buying the ticket.

The offensive stuff he’s done is stuff like (insert adultery and abuse and crazy, misogynistic, racist, vile rants against his wife and the mother of his child here) and *NOT* any given offensive movie he’s made.

I mean, it’s not like he got NEA funding.

22 Bob July 21, 2010 at 5:42 pm
23 Brett July 21, 2010 at 6:15 pm

To the stone throwers, perhaps it’s best we remembered sound advice given long ago: he who is without sin, throw the first stone.

What happened to “fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me”?

This is the second time that Gibson has been caught uttering wholly inappropriate language, the first being his arrest. There’s no excuse anymore, not when you’re a very public star who has been in the limelight for years.

24 Jonathan July 21, 2010 at 9:29 pm

@Brett, really? Erik throws out some thoughts on grace and humility, and you want to talk about being fooled? I would not have written what Erik wrote, but I fault him not for writing it.

25 Brett July 21, 2010 at 6:16 pm

By wholly inappropriate, I mean racist and anti-semitic stuff.

26 Eagle Driver July 21, 2010 at 7:08 pm

I do not believe that excuses should be made for his behavior as a man must be responsible and upstanding. Anger most likely never solved a problem. I agree with others in that the recordings were made for less than reputable reasons and that the party is guilty of manipulation to grandstand in the public eye.

Being a man who formerly became angry easily, I can tell you that gaining control of one’s attitude greatly assisted in controlling my anger. One becomes what they think, just as a farmer plants corn to reap a crop of corn. No matter how hard he wishes, prays, sacrifices, etc. he will not reap a crop of lettuce. Plant corn, reap corn. A great source of “enlightenment” was the booklet by James Allen: As A Man Thinketh from Wildside Press. You can get the entire booklet on line and also on CD.

Food for Thought, If you are Hungry

27 Jonathan July 21, 2010 at 9:31 pm

E.D., I’m not sure I can back your pseudo-defence of Gibson, but I understand where you’re coming from. Though I may not agree, I respect your post, and I’m glad that his thread hasn’t devolved into a giant hate-fest.

…although Beyond Thunderdome really did suck.

28 E.D. Kain July 21, 2010 at 10:40 pm

@Jonathan, Thanks. You have to give Thunderdome credit for all the spoofs it inspired, though.

29 Jonathan July 22, 2010 at 5:22 am

@E.D. Kain, fiar enough. And ‘We Don’t Need Another Hero’ really does kick the 80s nostalgia into gear, so it’s got that going for it.

30 Jonathan July 22, 2010 at 5:23 am

@Jonathan, *fair

Sigh. I should proofread more.

31 Jaybird July 22, 2010 at 7:55 am

@Jonathan, …although Beyond Thunderdome really did suck.

Have you no decency, sir?

32 sidereal July 24, 2010 at 11:16 am

I suspect Oksana Grigorieva is one of these moths – perhaps if Gibson had taped her without her knowledge a broader picture of their relationship would have emerged. I suspect there is much more to the story.

When one enters the business of defusing speculation about other souls, it’s probably best to avoid speculating oneself, especially when the speculatee was, by all appearances, beaten hard enough to break teeth while holding her child.

33 Jamie July 29, 2010 at 8:36 pm

It is time for Mel to go home in every way. He needs to go back to his roots. His faith, His foundations, His God. He needs to find peace in his soul through Peace with his God. From there, peace with his family. God came for royal screw ups. He qualifies. I suppose we all do. I hope he walks away from it all, And into the arms of all that really matters. And I wish I could tell him that…………

Comments on this entry are closed.

{ 6 trackbacks }