A funny thing happened with Community last week. Someone noticed that NBC hadn’t listed it on its midseason lineup. In its spot was 30 Rock, finally coming back from hiatus. Panic among Community fans quickly ensued. Twitter lit up with cries of objection and inside jokes from the shoe. I tweeted a jest from a recent episode about quickly creating a new timeline.
The reaction was pretty natural for lovers of any show but with Community it’s actually a little odd. For one thing the show isn’t actually very popular. Its audience is small and very tightly nit. It’s a fierce audience but a small one nonetheless. Secondly, there really shouldn’t be much surprise that the show would be canceled. By design Community is unwelcoming to newcomers. Over the past two-and-some-change seasons more and more of the show’s jokes have been either based on events and jokes from past episodes or incredibly nerdy pop culture or science fiction references (a recent favorite: Inspector Spacetime jokes). Humor like that is partially what makes Community funny and fun. You’re sharing an inside joke with the cast. You’re being rewarded with humor for paying close attention to the show.
The problem is, new viewers haven’t been paying close attention. They don’t get that reward for noticing a suggestive comment the Dean makes at Winger or watching Troy and Abed say “Troy and Abed sown to-GE-ther.” That’s both the show’s blessing and its curse. It’s hard for new viewers to get into the show. Meanwhile, the humor for regular viewers is enjoyable on multiple levels. There are the immediate jests and then the second layer ones that are funny for Community loyalists. But having a small, core group of fans isn’t enough for any t.v. show to survive. It needs a large audience and larger audiences come and go. Shows that are appealing because they are easy to get into will often do better than shows which are equally good but partially good because of the longstanding story arcs and trends. It’s just harder for someone to casually jump in and get hooked (not impossible, but harder).
So in complaining about the show’s demise, it’s a bit unfair to call it an outrage. To expect Community to last for, say, ten seasons is unrealistic. It just won’t. I’m not saying here that it should be a short-lived t.v. show, I’m saying that it’s unlikely to be. But if Dan Harmon (the show’s creator) were to change that very core aspect of the show then it really wouldn’t be the Community that’s created such an obsessed fanbase. The show is short-lived because it’s good in a certain way.
A little while ago both Erik and myself were giggling over this clip of Ben in Parks and Recreation passionately casting down the idea that HBO’s Game of Thrones would ever be canceled. Ben argues that it’s a hit because it tells real world stories in a fantasy setting. At the time, I said that that was a perfect explanation of why the show and series among non-traditionally fantasy inclined fans:
What I love about the clip is that the explanation is also one of the best and most succinct ones I’ve heard/seen of why the show/series is successful.*
Really? Do you know someone who’s fathered three children through his sister? Is your best friend a stunted dwarf desperate for love, drowning his sorrows in the bosoms of whores? Has your older brother been killed and his family’s home put to the torch because he decided to marry someone for love?
No. Ben’s explanation is incomplete. The reason the show is successful among non-fantasy lovers is because the characters think like normal people. This is not the clichéd epic where the protagonists talk in faux old English and are constantly worried about honor. These characters are appealing because we can understand how they think and we see that they aren’t always inclined to do the right thing. Sometimes they do the selfish, wrong, ugly, stupid, thing instead. It’s entirely human.
*I realize how absurd it is to quote oneself. I’m only doing it here because I’m criticizing my own comments.
I can’t find it in myself to like Ser Arys Oakheart, or feel sad for him. I just finished the chapter (SPOILERS) where Arianne’s rebellion fails. I know I’m supposed to feel pity for Oakheart. He was just trying to make his two girls happy —Myrcella by keeping her happy and Arianne by helping her with her plan. When Hotah catches Arianne’s little cadre in the act, Oakheart does what I suppose is considered the honorable thing according to the songs and tales of Westeros and sticks with his side, sacrificing himself clearly in a vain attempt to save what, if anything, could be saved of Arianne’s machinations.
Here’s the thing though, Oakheart should have spent more time polishing Arianne’s plans in whatever way he could. Gathering what little support he could or just…I don’t know…doing more than whatever Arianne did like the lovesick puppy he was. After all, what was at stake was his life, his love (err the person Oakheart loved) and Myrcella, his raison d’être. Instead though Oakheart just followed Arianne’s lead and got himself killed.
I had actually hoped that Oakheart was smarter than he was and actually tipped off Hotah and Prince Doran to Arianne’s scheme. Alas no, he just turned out to be a fool and not in the romantic sense, in the dumb sense. It’s just all really aggravating.
On the larger issue in question though, whether a war between Dorne and the Iron Throne would be a good thing I think it’s impossible to say. Right now King’s Landing is pretty weak and distracted with other conflicts so Dorne, which has stayed out of the fighting up till now, could probably survive. On the other hand, there’s no telling who would turn out to be the victor in the end. The sense I got from the Dorne chapters up till here is that the hunger for war among the Dornishmen is not at all thought out and more about a longstanding desire for revenge. It just doesn’t seem that smart.
I admit, when I saw my first Buck the Fuckeyes, I chuckled but I quickly realized there’s little value in shirts like those. Swift makes the case that shirts like those really don’t belong in college fandom at all: [click to continue…]
Does anybody else find the entire Iron Islands storyline tiresome and disconnected? I do. I just can’t find myself at all interested by Euron Crow’s Eye or Victarion or Asha. I also sort of get the sense that Martin knows these chapters are slow so every once in a while he’ll add a little sexual tension or comment on some woman’s body. But the sexual gratuity argument is not only exhausted but not my major gripe with the series. If I had to complain about one aspect of these books it would not be about how stupid Ned Stark is (really, it seems like the entire blogosphere agrees that Stark is stupid, just not in what way he’s stupid. Either way it’s not worth discussing.) My gripe is that there is no appealing mother character in the books. Correct me if I’m wrong here, but every character who’s a mother first (Cersei, Catelyn, Lysa) are all incompetent, insane, or some mixture of both. Their roles consistently involve messing things up and complicating things in an easily correctable manner. At one point Cersei thinks “Mothers are all the same.”
Now, the immediate counterargument is Daenerys. But she never was a mother for very long was she? She may be the “Mother of Dragons” but she’s really a queen first and a mother and keeper of her pet dragons second.
There’s also Gilly, I guess, but what does she do? From where I am in A Feast for Crows, she generally hugs Sam, carries a baby who’s not hers around, and cries a lot. There’s still time for her to muck things up though. Maybe when Sam and Gilly get to Oldtown she’ll burn down the Citadel. Who knows!
It occurs to me that an actual competent player of the game of thrones who is a mother is the Queen of Thorns. She’s actually fairly competent but, like Dany, I don’t really think of her as a mother first —more a matriarch of House Tyrell. She doesn’t seem particularly concerned for her son, for example, but rather the success of her house and their conquest of the Iron Throne. That’s not quite the top priority of a mother character. I consider Catelyn a maternal character because she’s always doing things based on the safety of her children which is hardly, as it appears from where I am, what the Queen of Thorns or, I suppose to a lesser degree, Dany does.
Everytime someone asks me to recommend a new band I rave and rave about The Bad Plus. They’re alternative jazz, I say, but not like you expect. They’re good and not just to jazz lovers. Lately I’ve been listening to “Never Stop” off of their album of the same name:
Nothing I write can completely capture my enthusiasm for this band so I’ll hand it over to The New Yorker‘s editor, David Remnick, who wrote a Talk story about them a while back. Read it here.
By the end of A Storm of Swords and the beginning of A Feast for Crows (which I just recently began rereading. I’m almost at A Dance!) Jaime’s transformation is roughly complete and Sansa has begun the next phase of becoming a major player of the game of thrones. (Warning, spoilers up to the beginning of A Feast ahead). [click to continue…]
League commenter Marianne is interested in Brienne of Tarth:
Well…. for one thing I think a woman knight idolizing Renly that way is an interesting take on the conventions of chivalry and courtly love. I don’t know much about those things outside of White (and Malory)… but it definitely seems to ring all the same changes, while being completely subversive in some way. *imagines Brienne jousting with a favor tied to her lance*
But really, I’m just curious to hear other people’s take on one of my favorite characters.
I can’t stress enough how much I like blogging about A Song of Ice and Fire at the League. The one problem is I sometimes don’t have an idea of what I want to blog about so I’m asking you all for recommendations. Keep in mind that I’m at the Jon Snow chapter in A Storm of Swords that begins “The ground was littered with pine needles and blown leaves, a carpet of green and brown still damp from the recent rains” (reading this on the Kindle so no page numbers, sorry) so I can’t write about stuff beyond there.
What do you want to talk about? (Please, no more discussing the stupidity of Ned Stark).
For me, one of the most unexpected point of views in A Storm of Swords was Jaime Lannister but as I read the third installment in A Song of Ice and Fire I’ve come to really enjoy his chapters and Jaime is now one of my favorite characters.
From the beginning, Jaime is portrayed as a repulsive, lecherous, egomaniac who’s only interested in sleeping with his sister, killing Targaryen kings, and surrounding himself with gold. The only small hint that there’s more to him is in the few mentions he makes of his brother Tyrion. (SPOILERS AHEAD) [click to continue…]
As I make my way through rereading the A Song of Ice and Fire books it’s becoming increasingly clear that the role of the King’s Hand is not what it was intended to be. I can’t speak for every Hand or every Hand mentioned in the books because I’m not as informed as I’d like [...]
I’ve always been a bit of a outsider. I’m partially naturally inclined that way and partially fond of being interested in things that a minority is, which is why I’ve been questioning whether I really do think Google+ is superior to Facebook. And I do. I grew up in the age of Facebook. I remember [...]
I’m a little late to this but I want to add a few words about a post Henry Farrell wrote in which he disagrees with Alyssa Rosenberg’s claim that the A Song of Ice and Fire series nicely parallels modern international statecraft: An international system based on dynastic politics works in very different ways from [...]
I’ve been waiting for an opportunity to write about one particular part of this book: the fight between Bronn and Ser Vardis Egen. If you haven’t already noticed, A Song of Ice and Fire doesn’t actually include that many fight scenes, or at least, as many fight scenes as you might expect from a series [...]
I want to talk about the Starks’ intelligence for a second now. Since the television series started I’ve seen a lot of online commentary saying that the Starks are pretty dumb. Obliviously stupid might be a better description. I don’t agree with that though and we can see that in what we’ve read so far. [...]
The single most pivotal event in these chapters is Jamie Lannister throwing Bran off a tower ledge. This is the event that changes the course of the lives of basically every character we’ve met so far so it deserves some examination. We know that Jamie Lannister is an impulsive monster just through this event. We [...]
Daniel: I have to admit, it’s a little hard to reread these chapters without considering what’s going to happen next. I just want to mention things that, right now, are all spoilers. The only thing to do, really, is to focus on the first impressions because that’s all we really have to talk about so [...]
So what’d everyone think of A Golden Crown? I actually haven’t watched it yet because I don’t get HBO so I have to wait a day for bootleg versions to show up online but, having read the books, I have an idea what happens. Karma’s a bitch. UPDATE 5/24/2011: Okay so I finally saw the [...]
Greetings League! Before I write any more I’d like to extend special thanks to E.D. Kain for giving me the opportunity to write here. Hopefully I won’t disappoint. Anyway, my name is Daniel and I’ll be E.D.’s copilot in this A Game of Thrones bookclub. I have no political stances and won’t engage in any [...]
Thursday Blognado: Wargaming My Thursday Blognado post is a guest post at Mindless Diversions wherein I explain why I abandoned miniature wargames produced by Games Workshop, and why Warmachine is my favourite wargame. ( 0 comments)
The Lessons of 1984 The primary lesson of George Orwell’s 1984 is that [my political opponents] are truly totalitarian in intent. The entire culture of [my political opponents] revolves around doublethink, such as [insert reference to something that is contradictory, but only if you put it the way I put it]. And don’t get me started on [my political opponents]‘s newspeak, what with [insert reference to or example of Political Correctness or alternately a way that political opponents frame an issue]. I truly fear if [my political opponents] gain and hold on to political power, 1984 will cease to be fiction. ( 15 comments)
Another from Edmond Rostand Rostand’s second poem from Les Musardises, entitled “The Bedroom.” For my English translation I chose rhymed couplets, though I admit with BlaiseP that there’s a procrustean quality to some of them.
Incidentally, the author dedicates a short essay to explaining the title of the book. Musardise is not a word in standard French, and figuring out a good English neolo-translation of the title is an interesting task in itself. ( 4 comments)
~ Around the League
Journeys in Alterity: Remaking Star Wars ~ Feb. 23. 2012. ~ The Star Wars films have their cinematic gems--and lightsabers, w... Read More
~
Mindless Diversions: Confessions! ~ Feb. 23. 2012. ~ (This guess post was written by our very own James K!)
My firs... Read More
American Times: Does The Cybersecurity Act Of 2012 Mark The Beginning Of The War On Cyber-terrorism? ~ Feb. 22. 2012. ~ The Cybersecurity Act of 2012 is the latest effort by Congress to do something about the threat of cyber attacks and cyber crime. Fortunately, and perhaps thanks to the efforts to quash SOPA and PIPA, the Act is quite a bit more restrained in scope tha... Read More
American Times: Did Foxconn Hide Underage Workers During Inspections? ~ Feb. 22. 2012. ~ Foxconn has opened its doors to the Fair Labor Association and ABC News – but is it hiding something? After reports of poor working conditions and worker suicides at ‘s Chinese vendors’ manufacturing facilities, a number of groups hav... Read More
~
American Times: What A Crowdsourced Bike Looks Like ~ Feb. 22. 2012. ~ Jess Zimmerman explains: This combination bike and scooter is nominally the work of fancypants designer Philippe Starck, but that’s partly because “everyone in Bordeaux, France” doesn’t have as much label cachet. (More than “everyone in Norma... Read More
~
Journeys in Alterity: Dust to Dust ~ Feb. 22. 2012. ~ [caption id="attachment_3632" align="alignleft" width="151" capti... Read More
~
American Times: David Cross on the contradictory language of the right ~ Feb. 22. 2012. ~ A couple people have directed me to this clip (which I would embed if it were allowed.) David Cross says what I was trying to say about the double-speak on the right much better – or at least much funnier – than I do. This is more evidence that while the right is very good at [...] Read More