Murali

James Hanley comments that

Christians have become (relatively) comfortable with teen birth (and I think he is right), it’s another classic case of Christians adapting their religion to their culture, rather than having any profound religious effect on their culture.

I’m wondering to what extent this is a feature of all religions and to what extent some religions are more susceptible to change than others. I’ve got a sense that the more iconoclastic a religion is, the more likely it will be unable to resist changing attitudes. Since the social conservativism of the US is hitched so thouroughly to Christianity and especially the evangelical strain of it, we will find that it cannot avoid the pressures of libertinism.

I will try to lay out roughly why I think this might be the case.

[click to continue…]

{ 5 comments }

Some thoughts on recent issues…

by Murali on February 16, 2012

I’ve not been pulling my weight in posts for a while and ideas have been running around in my head. So, instead of writing 3 separate posts, I will combine stuff into 1. So here goes…

[click to continue…]

{ 11 comments }

In a previous post, I wrote about abortion, which of course received some amount of pushback. However, I also got pushback from an unexpected direction. A number of commenters pushed back against trying to get more complete justifications for their beliefs.

Bsycho for instance says:

Does it harm the life or liberty of the uninvolved party?

If the answer is “no”, then the uninvolved party can fish off. Period

And when pushed as to why this is the case, answers:

Because harm to them is the only legitimate criteria by which they have any standing whatsoever to care. Without harm they’re just throwing a hissy fit because the world isn’t conforming to their personal aesthetic tastes. A society attempting to accommodate such people is flushing freedom down the toilet.

I don’t see how Rawls changes anything here. If you’re A, you have the right to do whatever you wish with consenting adults; if you’re B, you have that same right. If you’re B and you whine because you don’t get to block A, then you’re confusing liberty with obedience.

Charitably interpreted, I think that bsycho believes that his answer is sufficient to answer my question. Unfortunately, I disagree with him. One minor quibble is about whether the characterisation he provides is true. After all, we can cash out both sides in terms of liberty. One can on the one hand be free from being enslaved, or on the other hand be free to keep slaves. In cases of conflicting freedoms like this, it is important to explain why the freedom from enslavement trumps freedom to keep slaves. However, the key point of disagreement here is that the argument he gave is not sufficient. I can still ask why we should care about liberty instead of obedience. i.e. there is a problem of how to stop the sceptical regress.

[click to continue…]

{ 11 comments }

A reason to love SOPA

by Murali on January 22, 2012

Under SOPA, Justin Bieber would have been in jail! What a waste!

{ 5 comments }

Reason to hate Canada:

And a reason to love them:

Whether or not you forgive me just consider this an open thread:

{ 31 comments }

Stillwater’s Challenge

by Murali on January 18, 2012

In the comments of my most recent post on abortion, Stillwater says that few people have non-contradictory views. I demurr and point out that I dont have any contradictory beliefs. If I find that I did have contradictory beliefs, I would change them because I think that consistency is a bare minimal requirement. [click to continue…]

{ 48 comments }

One of the key questions of political philosophy is about when it  is ever appropriate for a state to use its coercive power. People have often had various answers to his question. The ancients (both the Greeks and the Chinese) thought that the aim of the state was to help its citizens to be virtuous beings. In fact, until the enlightenment (with rare exceptions), this was pretty much the only game in town. That changed.

[click to continue…]

{ 192 comments }

I live in Singapore and all citizens are required to have an Identity Card. (IC) The IC is very useful. It doubles as a library card, it serves as identification when I apply for overseas visas, or want to open a bank account etc. Someone’s IC also allows me to identify the other party if I get into an accident (i.e. who to pay or who to bill for damages etc etc). At this level (call it level 1) There doesn’t seem to be anything wrong with it. So, what are the problems with having a mandatory IC policy? (Presumably american social security cards are very similar except that they have neither fingerprint nor photo ID capabilities). Making it mandatory means that fake ICs will not pass a barcode test. If its genuine, the IC no will already be in a database.

Lets go a bit deeper. Let’s include fingerprint as well as DNA information in a database which is properly classified and only accessible by the police. When children register for their ICs, it is easy to take their fingerprints and DNA at the same time. The upshot of something like level 2 is that criminal investigations become a lot more accurate. DNA evidence can place people at crime scenes. This would also prevent bullshit things like deporting american citizens. Same question as before: what are the problems with making this mandatory?

Let’s go even deeper: Let’s call the following level 3 Let’s include stuff like income etc from the taxes that you file inside a database and link it up with your IC. So, if you are going to the hospital, instead of asking you to fill out a form for your insurance (as I see people doing in american TV shows) all the nurse has to do is to scan your card to pull up relevant information like your income and the amount of money in you Health Savings Account. The nurse can then provide you with an appropriate means tested service. This makes it easier to means test medical care and other social support services. It also cuts down on the red tape. Getting seen by a doctor become much easier.

I’m inclined to think that even level 3 would not violate any more fundamental rights than familiar forms of taxation. Are there liberal or libertarian arguments against this? Note, this is not an RFID system which allows you to be tracked. All this does is make things easier and more transparent on a lot of things. What liberty related reasons would we have to suppose in order for us to consider this a bad idea?

{ 53 comments }

I like to think of myself as a liberaltarian. I think I would qualify for the label because I’m big on the Rawls-Hayek fusion thing (Or more accurately, the Rawls + public choice + economic consensus). Yet, I have certain affinities with a social/cultural conservatism. Here are some of my social conservative thoughts. (No, not an oxymoron)

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Reasonable-ness, by what standard?

by Murali on December 23, 2011

By request (or at least approval), I have produced a post on reasonable-ness. Note that this has nothing to do with certain kinds of legal standards

People often say that something is reasonable to believe, or surely that reasonable people can disagree. But often when saying this, people fail to specify what their standards of reasonability are. Of course, we know what the highest epistemic standards require. The very highest of standards require nothing short of sound arguments. i.e. arguments in which the conclusions necessarily follow from the premises and in which the premises are true. But by that route requires us to reserve judgement on a great many issues including for example, the existence of other minds, or the external world or even about whether or not we should have high epistemic standards in the first place.

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Opposite day: The limits of Burkean gradualism

by Murali December 6, 2011

Ilarum is once again at the breach fighting all the wrong battles. He imprudently charges where I would prefer to reserve judgement. This time however, he may have a sliver of a point. I do not so much disagree with him, as think he may be overstating his conclusions. Hi, I’m back again as this Opposite [...]

23 comments Read the full article →

Opposite Day: The case for democracy

by Murali December 5, 2011

Let me introduce my twin brother Ilarum, who of course tends to be wrong on a lot of things. Nevertheless, Today is his day to make a fool of himself shine. My twin is a lot better at words than I am, but do not get beguiled by his smooth tongue. Let him say his [...]

6 comments Read the full article →

Opposite day at the League!

by Murali November 28, 2011

There is a semi-grand blogospheric pseudo-tradition called opposite day. On opposite day… atheists do their best to argue that theism is correct and the theists do their best to argue that atheism is correct. Perhaps some Jews can argue that Christianity is correct and vice versa. The point is to get you to put yourself in [...]

63 comments Read the full article →

From the comments: Doctors and Bankers

by Murali November 24, 2011

Jesse Ewiak writes: If I go to a doctor and he tells me I need this procedure and it turns it out it ruins my life, it’s perfectly reasonable to blame the doctor. Yet, I say the same thing about a banker and I hear calls of personal responsibility. I guess I should’ve known medical [...]

72 comments Read the full article →

Murali’s Democratic Impossibility Theorem

by Murali November 22, 2011

Ladies and Gentlemen this being the latest in a round of posts on democracy, is going to be long. I also promise that it will be bizarre. I would like to talk about two features of democracies, which each,, in themselves are essential, but create a particular strange problem when found together. These two features [...]

11 comments Read the full article →

Drakensang Online!

by Murali November 15, 2011

Ladies and gentlemen I present to you  a free MMO RPG with brilliant graphics and fairly decent gameplay. Check this out!  

Read the full article →

Bad choices (Or Where I come off as a judgemental jerk)

by Murali November 3, 2011

Commenter John Howard Griffin writes:

40 comments Read the full article →

Communitarianism and a free-standing theory of justice.

by Murali November 3, 2011

Fellow Gentleman Tom Van Dyke recently wrote the following: For if I were an atheist member of Congress, I’d still follow GWash on the political and social utility of religion.  No big deal.  Religion, like paying taxes, is for the little people. The interesting thing about Mr Van Dyke’s argument is that it purports to [...]

14 comments Read the full article →

Weekend Navel Gazing: Old Boys Clubs

by Murali October 29, 2011

Commenter Ktward writes And so I’m wondering, E.D.: If you weren’t speaking to Forbes readers and the Boys Club that is the League (not a criticism, simply an observation), might your take on OWS be less guarded? Granting that she is just making an observation, it seems that her observation is correct. The gentle-persons in the [...]

93 comments Read the full article →

Gridlock, Graft and Governance

by Murali October 24, 2011

There seems to be a libertarian tendency to celebrate gridlock. Given that this is running off the top of my head, the latest example by Prof Hanley  can’t afford either “low key” government or any gridlock…government that brooks no dissent is all I currently have. While I may be over-interpreting him, I do remember lots of [...]

127 comments Read the full article →

Weekend Jukebox: Retro style! (as if we do it any other way)

by Murali October 21, 2011

So, as the newcomer, its my turn to do the weekend Jukebox. Enjoy folks! And for something which everyone should know…   Consider this an open thread.

5 comments Read the full article →

This is my Prime Minister

by Murali October 20, 2011

Its election season again in the US (when is it not). Election season just finished for us a month ago in Singapore. So, something I want to ask you guys is this: This is my PM. Would you vote for him if he were running for office where you live? If yes, why? If not, why [...]

15 comments Read the full article →

Economics and Values

by Murali October 19, 2011

In a semi-recent post by fellow Gentleman JamesK, commenter Creon Critic gave an ineresting comment that bears a reply Take the issue of trade liberalization discussed in this thread. Competing values include preserving a way of life and expressing disapproval at exploitative working conditions in developing countries. Specific values issues that might come up: What cultural [...]

122 comments Read the full article →

Some thoughts on the social sciences.

by Murali October 13, 2011

I am currently taking a course on the epistemology of disagreement and social epistemology. One of the topics that came up was about what to do about experts.

53 comments Read the full article →

Greetings Earthlings!

by Murali October 11, 2011

Our estimable host Erik Kain has invited me to be part of the main page. It seems to be a tradition for people to drop their nicknames and adopt a more formal full name. Pat Calahan became Patrick. RTod became Tod Kelly and so on. My full name is Anantharaman Muralidharan. Given that my name is so long, [...]

34 comments Read the full article →
1 pages